Creating an AI Course Policy with Students

Generative Artificial Intelligence with a microchip, labeled with AI and circuits coming off of it.

Dr. Elizabeth Urban from the history department co-creates an AI course policy with her students. She begins by collecting students perceptions on AI using a 3 question survey.

Question 1:

“What should my Artificial Intelligence Policy be in this Course?”

  • No AI whatsoever, period. 
  • Can use AI with citation / documentation and explicit instructor approval
  • Can use AI with citation / documentation (instructor approval is assumed)
  • Free, unlimited AI use

Question 2:

“When do you think it is appropriate to use AI in this course?” (select all that apply)

  • Brainstorming or coming up with ideas  
  • Looking up background information on a topic
  • Doing research into a topic
  • Organizing thoughts on making an outline
  • Proofreading or improving writing
  • Completing informal assignments (such as reflections or reading responses)
  • Completing formal, graded assignments (such as essays or projects)
  • Composing emails or other communication
  • Other (fill out blank below)

Question 3 :

Explain your choices in 2 to 3 sentences.

Dr. Urban then used those responses to draft a policy which she presents back to the students for ratification during class time. They have a chance to discuss the results, make tweaks, and vote on its approval. Here is an example: 

Dr. Urban’s AI Policy, Fall 2024

You may use generative AI (such as ChatGPT) in my course. However, there are certain limitations and expectations around its use. 

  1. You MAY NEVER simply copy and paste AI-generated output and submit it as your work. This is especially true for formal, graded assignments.
    • If I strongly suspect you’ve done this, your assignment will receive a grade of 0 and we will have a follow-up conversation about it in my office hours.
    • If I suspect you do it again after our initial conversation, I will write you up for a formal violation of academic integrity. 
  2. You MAY use AI tools to help you brainstorm ideas, understand concepts, or help improve/organize your writing (ahem, *your* writing). But then you must think critically about what AI tells you and use your own human brain to improve the work. 
  3. If you use AI tools to help with your work, you must DOCUMENT your AI use. That means, you must tell me the following things: 
    • What prompts you used.
    • What you did with those prompts. How did you incorporate them, fact-check them, improve upon them, or otherwise think critically about them? 
    • You may add this information to your submitted work as a footnote or as a separate attachment. 
    • You may also simply take a screen shot of your “conversation” with AI and attach that image to your work. 
  4. Anything you submit is considered your own work and you are RESPONSIBLE for it. 
    • If you use AI to help you, and AI is wrong (which it often is, I’m afraid), you are still held accountable for that. 
    • If you use AI to help you, and AI’s work is surface-level and generic (which it almost always is, I’m afraid), you are still held accountable for that. 
  5. Remember some of the VALUES of professional historians (and history students): 
    • Practice your work with integrity 
    • Document your sources 
    • Our enterprise depends on mutual trust
    • We should never betray that trust
  6. Now that you know my policy, I TRUST you to follow it. I’m always open to conversations, discussions, and questions about this policy. When in doubt, just ask me!